Download here: http://gg.gg/osf8c
IdenTrust works with member banks to issue individual certificates based on globally recognized and regulated Know Your Customer (KYC) rules. Financial institutions from around the world developed and agreed on the IdenTrust PLOT Rule Set; adherence provides non-repudiation and a limitation of liability.
*Trust Network & Wireless Cards Driver Download For Windows 8
*Trust Network & Wireless Cards Driver Download For Windows 7
Log-in and transactional authentication and encryption ensures privacy, security and non-repudiation.
(Redirected from Zero Trust Networks) Zero trust networks (also, zero trust network architecture, zero trust security model, ZTA, ZTNA), in the field of Information Technology (IT) describes an approach to the design and implementation of IT networks. Who is DirectTrust? DirectTrust instills trust in the secure exchange of health information for improved patient care. Featured News Featured Event Recent Blog Post Read the Latest Benefits of Membership.Trust Network Certificates
Trust Network TLS/SSL certificates authenticate machine-to-machine communications during a Transport Layer Security (TLS)/Secure Socket Layer (SSL) connection using a 256-bit certificate. TLS/SSL is widely used to protect information such as credit card numbers and account information via the Web. IdenTrust uses standard x.509 v3 certificates that work with all TLS/SSL-capable browsers and servers.
Using Know Your Customer (KYC) guidelines, a bank can confirm the identity of its customers and issue Trust Network digital certificates to them. Bank customers can use certificates for digital signing and to authenticate themselves when transacting business electronically. These certificates can be issued to individuals (Consumer certificates) or to individuals who are affiliated with and will be representing a business or organization (Business certificates).
In the Trust Network, certificates that are issued by one bank are recognized by all banks in the network, as the use of Know Your Customer (KYC) for authentication is used ubiquitously and accepted by the banking and financial market. Because Trust Network certificate holders are authenticated using this standard, they can use their certificates to transact business with any Trust Network member bank.
The PLOT Rule Set is a combination of four (4) distinct elements that provide a comprehensive solution to risk management in digital transactions:
*Policies
*Legal Framework
*Operations Hosting
*Technology
Learn more about the PLOT Blueprint.Issuing IdenTrust Trust Network Certificates
*Customers or businesses register with an IdenTrust member bank by supplying their identity information and agreeing to minimum Terms and Conditions specified in the IdenTrust PLOT Rule Set.
*The IdenTrust member bank validates the identity information in accordance with Know Your Customer (KYC) requirements. IdenTrust verifies, at minimum, the following: a. That the certificate applicant is authorized to act on behalf of the customer organization (Business and Server certificates only) b. That the physical address, phone number and email address are valid c. That the domain name ownership is valid (for Server certificates only)
*Once it completes the KYC procedures, the IdenTrust member bank sends an activation information and fulfillment package to the certificate applicant’s verified physical address via an out-of-band delivery method such as postal mail. This package may include software drivers, installation instructions and a physical key storage mechanism such as a smart card or USB token.
*Using the activation information, the certificate applicant generates and retrieves their digital certificate. With IdenTrust Trust Network certificates, banks can rest assured that they are providing their customers with a secure, proven digital certificate.
Banks know their customers and customers know (and trust) their banks. IdenTrust Trust Network certificates leverage that trusted relationship in an online world.Benefits of Trust Network Certificates
Trust Network certificates:
*Offer strong multi-factor authentication by using Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) that relies on both a public and private key to provide the strongest authentication available
*Support global interoperability by being legally binding and accepted in all countries belonging to the World Trade Organization
*Leverage existing infrastructure by using the IdenTrust hosted environment, enabling financial institutions to focus on customer service rather than building and maintaining a digital certificate infrastructure
*Rely on the PLOT Rule Set which is offered to a members-only network to ensure compliance with the rule set, resulting in reduced risk when using electronic communications
IdenTrust bank issued certificates can be used by both financial institutions and customers for a variety of electronic commerce applications including:
*Authenticating online account openings and maintenance
*Loan origination
*Treasury management
*Electronic invoicing
To learn more about Trust Network certificates, please contact IdenTrust at Sales@IdenTrust.com or call 1 (866) 763-3346.This page is currently inactive and is retained for historical reference.Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus on its purpose has become unclear. To revive discussion, seek broader input via a forum such as the village pump.A related active project is Wikipedia:Personal acquaintances. This system in a nutshell:The trust network exists to allow users to systematically document their trust-relationships, and to see which users have declared trust in another user. It is not a popularity contest or editor rating.
This proposal for a ’web of trust’ is inspired by the mailing list thread that began with this posting by Jimbo Wales and was started by Pcb21 on 17 February 2004. Its implementation in the German Wikipedia as Wikipedia:Vertrauensnetz was started by Sansculotte and Elian on 23 July 2004. This proposed system for the English Wikipedia shares the three key ideas of Vertrauensnetz: giving users a formal way of declaring their confidence in other users, a way of seeing which users have declared their trust of a particular user, and the resulting structure of trust-relationships formed between all users (see below). The key differences between the inactive system and the presently proposed are that the inactive system relied upon the editing of a centrally-stored table and allowed formal expressions of distrust.
In March 2005 it was started on Meta as m:Web of trust and m:Vertrauensnetz by Arnomane.
The web of trust is neither a popularity contest nor a measurement or assessment of an editor’s trustworthiness or value.[1] However, it provides an additional piece of information that may be useful when coming across another user for the first time. The Wikipedia user base is so large that two well-established and respected editors, concentrating on different areas of Wikipedia, may have no contact between each other for some time. Reading an editor’s user page, browsing through their contributions, and reading the threads in their talk are valuable but time-consuming methods of getting to know someone. Discovering that several reputable users, or users that you have particular regard for, have expressed their trust in an editor is a strong indicator of that editor’s value to Wikipedia. However, the sheer number of editors who trust a user should not be taken as a clear measurement of that user’s trustworthiness: the fact that a user is trusted by dozens of suspected sockpuppets would only harm their reputation.
There are a variety of reasons to express trust in another user: you may have worked together on a proposal or article, reviewed many of their edits in articles on your watchlist, or know them personally. Liking another user should not generally be enough; trusting somebody requires being confident that their contributions are civil, constructive and of generally high quality. It is important that the trust network does not just become a popularity contest, and that the lack of an explicit statement of trust should never be interpreted as a statement of distrust. Additionally, it would be wise to consider carefully any thoughts of writing explicit statements of distrust, bearing in mind the no personal attacks policy.Using the features of the trust network[edit]To see who trusts a user[edit]
Go to Special:Whatlinkshere/User:Example user/Trusted by, where Example user is the user being considered. Alternatively, use {{trust}} with the username to produce Example user (talk • contribs • trusts • trusted by), which provides direct links to lists of other users who trust that user, and also the contributors that user trusts.To assert trust in other users[edit]
*Make a /Trust subpage of your userpage, e.g. User:Example user/Trust
*Include the {{Trust network}} template, writing {{Trust network|Example user}} where ’Example user’ is your username.
*After that, make a list of Wikipedians that you trust, making use of the template {{I trust|User name|Reason (optional)}} – for an example, see User:TheGrappler/Trust.Applications[edit]
The network can help to reveal the extent to which Wikipedia contributors are trusted by their peers. This information might serve several purposes: for instance, as an indicator when considering to what extent the Wikipedia content added by a user can be trusted, when taking part in recent changes patrol, or when considering a request for adminship.
The network itself can be analysed using a trust metric to rate individual users. There are very many different ways to do this, which will produce quite different results, and it is important to note that no metric is endorsed by this proposal. The simplest trust metric is to count the number of users who trust the rated user, but this system is vulnerable to attack (for instance, the use of sockpuppet accounts to trust oneself). Another is to count how many links there are in the chain of trust between yourself and another user: if I trust A, who trusts B, who trusts C, and this is the shortest path from myself to C, then C is three links away from me. I might decide that I explicitly trust anybody one link away from me, and implicitly trust anybody up to three links away. This is very different to the previous case: the measurement is personal, not absolute, and will not be affected by sock puppetry.
More advanced metrics, most famously Advogato’s innovative trust metric, are attack-resistant, but may require a core ’seed’ of users trusted by the metric itself. Different choices for this seeding will produce different results, and different users will decide on completely distinct seed choices: there is therefore no prospect of this producing an official editor rating system through Wikipedia using this system.Potential for misuse[edit]
Declarations of trust should be limited to users the declarer has high confidence in, but not necessarily all those that they like or agree with. Since ’who trusts you?’ is more important than ’how many people trust you?’ there is little point in creating sock puppets to declare trust in yourself. It would not be appropriate to make statements of trust as part of deals, either for tit-for-tat recognition or for a favour elsewhere. Again, since it is unlikely that anybody offering such an arrangement is a respected member of the community, there is little benefit in having that person declare their trust in you. It is important to remember that the trust network is not a popularity contest, and so there is no need to actively seek out declarations of trust. The fact that another user has not made a declaration of trust in your favour is by no means a declaration of distrust.
A web of trust should not be overly relied upon. Naturally, new but excellent contributors will take time to be integrated into the web. Neither does the web document even widespread distrust of a user. For this reason, it will always be important to peruse user and user talk pages, as well as an editor’s contributions, when trying to find out about a user you have recently encountered.Structure of the network[edit]
Strictly speaking, the ’web of trust’ is actually a directed graph rather than a network. The nodes are individual users, with the relationship ’User X trusts User Y’ resulting in an edge directed from User X’s node to User Y’s. The web of trust can therefore be analysed using graph theory: a copy of the entire web of trust could be extracted from Wikipedia for this purpose.Notes[edit]Trust Network & Wireless Cards Driver Download For Windows 8
*^The web consists simply of a collection of trust-relationships: it measures nothing. However, this information could be extracted from Wikipedia and analysed, in many different ways, to produce ’trust values’ for individual users. The results will vary depending on which trust metric is used, and none is officially endorsed. See the applications section for more information.Trust Network & Wireless Cards Driver Download For Windows 7Retrieved from ’https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Trust_network&oldid=1000628499’
Download here: http://gg.gg/osf8c
https://diarynote-jp.indered.space
IdenTrust works with member banks to issue individual certificates based on globally recognized and regulated Know Your Customer (KYC) rules. Financial institutions from around the world developed and agreed on the IdenTrust PLOT Rule Set; adherence provides non-repudiation and a limitation of liability.
*Trust Network & Wireless Cards Driver Download For Windows 8
*Trust Network & Wireless Cards Driver Download For Windows 7
Log-in and transactional authentication and encryption ensures privacy, security and non-repudiation.
(Redirected from Zero Trust Networks) Zero trust networks (also, zero trust network architecture, zero trust security model, ZTA, ZTNA), in the field of Information Technology (IT) describes an approach to the design and implementation of IT networks. Who is DirectTrust? DirectTrust instills trust in the secure exchange of health information for improved patient care. Featured News Featured Event Recent Blog Post Read the Latest Benefits of Membership.Trust Network Certificates
Trust Network TLS/SSL certificates authenticate machine-to-machine communications during a Transport Layer Security (TLS)/Secure Socket Layer (SSL) connection using a 256-bit certificate. TLS/SSL is widely used to protect information such as credit card numbers and account information via the Web. IdenTrust uses standard x.509 v3 certificates that work with all TLS/SSL-capable browsers and servers.
Using Know Your Customer (KYC) guidelines, a bank can confirm the identity of its customers and issue Trust Network digital certificates to them. Bank customers can use certificates for digital signing and to authenticate themselves when transacting business electronically. These certificates can be issued to individuals (Consumer certificates) or to individuals who are affiliated with and will be representing a business or organization (Business certificates).
In the Trust Network, certificates that are issued by one bank are recognized by all banks in the network, as the use of Know Your Customer (KYC) for authentication is used ubiquitously and accepted by the banking and financial market. Because Trust Network certificate holders are authenticated using this standard, they can use their certificates to transact business with any Trust Network member bank.
The PLOT Rule Set is a combination of four (4) distinct elements that provide a comprehensive solution to risk management in digital transactions:
*Policies
*Legal Framework
*Operations Hosting
*Technology
Learn more about the PLOT Blueprint.Issuing IdenTrust Trust Network Certificates
*Customers or businesses register with an IdenTrust member bank by supplying their identity information and agreeing to minimum Terms and Conditions specified in the IdenTrust PLOT Rule Set.
*The IdenTrust member bank validates the identity information in accordance with Know Your Customer (KYC) requirements. IdenTrust verifies, at minimum, the following: a. That the certificate applicant is authorized to act on behalf of the customer organization (Business and Server certificates only) b. That the physical address, phone number and email address are valid c. That the domain name ownership is valid (for Server certificates only)
*Once it completes the KYC procedures, the IdenTrust member bank sends an activation information and fulfillment package to the certificate applicant’s verified physical address via an out-of-band delivery method such as postal mail. This package may include software drivers, installation instructions and a physical key storage mechanism such as a smart card or USB token.
*Using the activation information, the certificate applicant generates and retrieves their digital certificate. With IdenTrust Trust Network certificates, banks can rest assured that they are providing their customers with a secure, proven digital certificate.
Banks know their customers and customers know (and trust) their banks. IdenTrust Trust Network certificates leverage that trusted relationship in an online world.Benefits of Trust Network Certificates
Trust Network certificates:
*Offer strong multi-factor authentication by using Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) that relies on both a public and private key to provide the strongest authentication available
*Support global interoperability by being legally binding and accepted in all countries belonging to the World Trade Organization
*Leverage existing infrastructure by using the IdenTrust hosted environment, enabling financial institutions to focus on customer service rather than building and maintaining a digital certificate infrastructure
*Rely on the PLOT Rule Set which is offered to a members-only network to ensure compliance with the rule set, resulting in reduced risk when using electronic communications
IdenTrust bank issued certificates can be used by both financial institutions and customers for a variety of electronic commerce applications including:
*Authenticating online account openings and maintenance
*Loan origination
*Treasury management
*Electronic invoicing
To learn more about Trust Network certificates, please contact IdenTrust at Sales@IdenTrust.com or call 1 (866) 763-3346.This page is currently inactive and is retained for historical reference.Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus on its purpose has become unclear. To revive discussion, seek broader input via a forum such as the village pump.A related active project is Wikipedia:Personal acquaintances. This system in a nutshell:The trust network exists to allow users to systematically document their trust-relationships, and to see which users have declared trust in another user. It is not a popularity contest or editor rating.
This proposal for a ’web of trust’ is inspired by the mailing list thread that began with this posting by Jimbo Wales and was started by Pcb21 on 17 February 2004. Its implementation in the German Wikipedia as Wikipedia:Vertrauensnetz was started by Sansculotte and Elian on 23 July 2004. This proposed system for the English Wikipedia shares the three key ideas of Vertrauensnetz: giving users a formal way of declaring their confidence in other users, a way of seeing which users have declared their trust of a particular user, and the resulting structure of trust-relationships formed between all users (see below). The key differences between the inactive system and the presently proposed are that the inactive system relied upon the editing of a centrally-stored table and allowed formal expressions of distrust.
In March 2005 it was started on Meta as m:Web of trust and m:Vertrauensnetz by Arnomane.
The web of trust is neither a popularity contest nor a measurement or assessment of an editor’s trustworthiness or value.[1] However, it provides an additional piece of information that may be useful when coming across another user for the first time. The Wikipedia user base is so large that two well-established and respected editors, concentrating on different areas of Wikipedia, may have no contact between each other for some time. Reading an editor’s user page, browsing through their contributions, and reading the threads in their talk are valuable but time-consuming methods of getting to know someone. Discovering that several reputable users, or users that you have particular regard for, have expressed their trust in an editor is a strong indicator of that editor’s value to Wikipedia. However, the sheer number of editors who trust a user should not be taken as a clear measurement of that user’s trustworthiness: the fact that a user is trusted by dozens of suspected sockpuppets would only harm their reputation.
There are a variety of reasons to express trust in another user: you may have worked together on a proposal or article, reviewed many of their edits in articles on your watchlist, or know them personally. Liking another user should not generally be enough; trusting somebody requires being confident that their contributions are civil, constructive and of generally high quality. It is important that the trust network does not just become a popularity contest, and that the lack of an explicit statement of trust should never be interpreted as a statement of distrust. Additionally, it would be wise to consider carefully any thoughts of writing explicit statements of distrust, bearing in mind the no personal attacks policy.Using the features of the trust network[edit]To see who trusts a user[edit]
Go to Special:Whatlinkshere/User:Example user/Trusted by, where Example user is the user being considered. Alternatively, use {{trust}} with the username to produce Example user (talk • contribs • trusts • trusted by), which provides direct links to lists of other users who trust that user, and also the contributors that user trusts.To assert trust in other users[edit]
*Make a /Trust subpage of your userpage, e.g. User:Example user/Trust
*Include the {{Trust network}} template, writing {{Trust network|Example user}} where ’Example user’ is your username.
*After that, make a list of Wikipedians that you trust, making use of the template {{I trust|User name|Reason (optional)}} – for an example, see User:TheGrappler/Trust.Applications[edit]
The network can help to reveal the extent to which Wikipedia contributors are trusted by their peers. This information might serve several purposes: for instance, as an indicator when considering to what extent the Wikipedia content added by a user can be trusted, when taking part in recent changes patrol, or when considering a request for adminship.
The network itself can be analysed using a trust metric to rate individual users. There are very many different ways to do this, which will produce quite different results, and it is important to note that no metric is endorsed by this proposal. The simplest trust metric is to count the number of users who trust the rated user, but this system is vulnerable to attack (for instance, the use of sockpuppet accounts to trust oneself). Another is to count how many links there are in the chain of trust between yourself and another user: if I trust A, who trusts B, who trusts C, and this is the shortest path from myself to C, then C is three links away from me. I might decide that I explicitly trust anybody one link away from me, and implicitly trust anybody up to three links away. This is very different to the previous case: the measurement is personal, not absolute, and will not be affected by sock puppetry.
More advanced metrics, most famously Advogato’s innovative trust metric, are attack-resistant, but may require a core ’seed’ of users trusted by the metric itself. Different choices for this seeding will produce different results, and different users will decide on completely distinct seed choices: there is therefore no prospect of this producing an official editor rating system through Wikipedia using this system.Potential for misuse[edit]
Declarations of trust should be limited to users the declarer has high confidence in, but not necessarily all those that they like or agree with. Since ’who trusts you?’ is more important than ’how many people trust you?’ there is little point in creating sock puppets to declare trust in yourself. It would not be appropriate to make statements of trust as part of deals, either for tit-for-tat recognition or for a favour elsewhere. Again, since it is unlikely that anybody offering such an arrangement is a respected member of the community, there is little benefit in having that person declare their trust in you. It is important to remember that the trust network is not a popularity contest, and so there is no need to actively seek out declarations of trust. The fact that another user has not made a declaration of trust in your favour is by no means a declaration of distrust.
A web of trust should not be overly relied upon. Naturally, new but excellent contributors will take time to be integrated into the web. Neither does the web document even widespread distrust of a user. For this reason, it will always be important to peruse user and user talk pages, as well as an editor’s contributions, when trying to find out about a user you have recently encountered.Structure of the network[edit]
Strictly speaking, the ’web of trust’ is actually a directed graph rather than a network. The nodes are individual users, with the relationship ’User X trusts User Y’ resulting in an edge directed from User X’s node to User Y’s. The web of trust can therefore be analysed using graph theory: a copy of the entire web of trust could be extracted from Wikipedia for this purpose.Notes[edit]Trust Network & Wireless Cards Driver Download For Windows 8
*^The web consists simply of a collection of trust-relationships: it measures nothing. However, this information could be extracted from Wikipedia and analysed, in many different ways, to produce ’trust values’ for individual users. The results will vary depending on which trust metric is used, and none is officially endorsed. See the applications section for more information.Trust Network & Wireless Cards Driver Download For Windows 7Retrieved from ’https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Trust_network&oldid=1000628499’
Download here: http://gg.gg/osf8c
https://diarynote-jp.indered.space
コメント